Nate Silver has published a handy interactive map for the impact of various minority groups in past/future elections. Relying on that map, Byron York published the following article which claimed, using Nate's map, that "Romney would have had to win 73 percent of the Hispanic vote to prevail in 2012." I checked Byron's results against Nate's map, and it appears Byron is correctly utilizing it. In fact, from playing with the Map's numbers and holding everything else constant for the 2012 election, here is the minimum number of the Hispanic votes that the Map claims Obama was required to obtain to win the following states:
Ohio - 25% and tossup at 24%
Virginia - 37% and tossup at 36%
Pennsylvania - 29% and tossup at 28%
Colorado - 52%
Florida - 69%
These numbers though seem to conflict with a prior NYTimes Nov. 20, 2012 post, which utilized Exit Poll data reported by Edison Research. That post said different numbers of Hispanic voters were required for the Dems to claim various states that they in fact carried. Those states, and the number of Hispanic voters that it claimed Obama need to carry them, are as follows:
Ohio - 22%
Virginia - 33%
Pennsylvania - 37%
Colorado - "just over 58%"
Florida - 58%
There is a pretty substantial difference with what the Map and the Nov. 20, 2012 article is reporting was needed, for some of these states. Because I am not a stat professional and could easily be making a mistake I am not aware of I have posed the following questions to Nate Silver on his 538 blog and am hoping for a clarifying answer:
(a) Am I/Byron York using your interactive map correctly?;(b) Am I interpreting your interactive map correctly?(c) Was the Nov. 20, 2012 New York Times post incorrect?;(d) Is your map incorrect?; and/or(e) Any other explanation.
For if it turns out that that there is a mistake in the Nate's interactive map, Byron and his allies might need to rethink their use of it to diminish the importance of the Hispanic vote in the 2012 election.